undefined | Better HN

0 pointsdiffuse_l1y ago0 comments

There is another point to consider here. The state of anti-virus solutions before Microsoft released Defender was horrible (probably still is).

It was full of ad infested solutions, which would crash your computer from time to time.

Defender at least was reasonably performant and tended to be stable.

You could say that since they had access to kernel source, they were better informed, but I guess if there was an API, the provided documentation would solve the issue (not necessarily, not everyone bothers to read the docs).

But then you get back on how to enforce equal and open access for everyone (the EU did try to make Microsoft open the Word file format, but turned out it was so complicated and documented in legacy code only, that Micorsoft had trouble giving useful docs)

Anyway, as you said, it's complicated...

0 comments

btilly1y ago

Yes. Defender was legitimately better than the alternatives. In fact no AV at all was better - which is something that I learned from Google's Project Zero.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsdiffuse_l1y ago0 comments

There is another point to consider here. The state of anti-virus solutions before Microsoft released Defender was horrible (probably still is).

It was full of ad infested solutions, which would crash your computer from time to time.

Defender at least was reasonably performant and tended to be stable.

Anyway, as you said, it's complicated...