undefined | Better HN

0 pointspton_xd1y ago0 comments

Many industries, like AAA game development, work this way.

There's a good reason for it -- code quality and performance is important. Understanding what your code actually does and how it does it, is important.

And as a result, AAA game software is able to push the boundaries of consumer compute performance. Micro-library-built software is generally just bloated crap that barely works. But it is fast to churn out, so there's that.

0 comments

SOLAR_FIELDS1y ago

Fair points. But for every bad library there are 10 rock solid ones that are going to do a better job handling edge cases and being performant than you can for almost no additional effort.

Really what this comes down to is the pickiness of package repo maintainers and general skill level of engineers within the ecosystem. This kind of crap and cruft discussed in the article happens in ecosystems where the barrier to entry is tiny. You don’t really hear about left-pad like fiascos in Java land or Rust land. Not saying all devs are great that use these technologies, but in Rust case you really don’t contribute packages without jumping over some serious learning curve hoops and in Java land the canonical repository (Maven Central) is difficult enough to contribute to that it also staves off fly-by-night contributors

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointspton_xd1y ago0 comments

Many industries, like AAA game development, work this way.

There's a good reason for it -- code quality and performance is important. Understanding what your code actually does and how it does it, is important.

0 comments

SOLAR_FIELDS1y ago

Fair points. But for every bad library there are 10 rock solid ones that are going to do a better job handling edge cases and being performant than you can for almost no additional effort.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse