undefined | Better HN

0 pointsthrowaway485401y ago0 comments

Owning a company providing a secure communication product is not negligent nor non-compliance.

0 comments

> non-compliance

It depends to what they're being asked to be compliant with.

This is really out of scope for this case though. Most of what is discussed in this case is about public, unencrypted channels

Seems like that's just become up for legal clarification.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsthrowaway485401y ago0 comments

Owning a company providing a secure communication product is not negligent nor non-compliance.

rtsil1y ago

> non-compliance

It depends to what they're being asked to be compliant with.

This is really out of scope for this case though. Most of what is discussed in this case is about public, unencrypted channels

Seems like that's just become up for legal clarification.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse