I'm sympathetic to your views about government policies manipulating which items get studied (see: previous conservative Canadian government muzzling scientists who made comments about oil)
I also agree that personal anecdotes from trusted parties are more valuable to my decision making than "data" — but those are personal anecdotes, not anecdotes from anonymous Internet personas.
We aren't your friends and we don't know you. Why should we trust you if you are vaguebooking about something that is a common conspiracy trope?