Docker-OSX image removed after Apple reports copyright infringement (opens in new tab)

Which is fair. OS X isn't open source so you can't just go and distribute binaries of it without Apple's permission. The Github repo probably requires you to bring your own binaries (presumably obtained from Apple in their approved way). So, that's perfectly fine. You can build and use the docker image for your own personal use. That's fair use and I doubt Apple would object to that. You just can't distribute the images to third parties without a license.

That's not what copyright infringement is.

> Why?

It seems like the repo's primary reasons are security research on macOS.

> They transition away from x86 anyway

I'm not sure what that has to do with running a Docker container. Containers support arm64; presumably you could do arm64 in both host and guest OS. (IDK if this particular image does; never used it.)

Money.

Damn son, way to show you know nothing about what you are doing.

They want to make sure you can only develop Apps for Apple devices on expansive Apple devices.