So we should allow them to subsidize the Western energy transition? And cost the CCP money at the same time? Literally have the Chinese taxpayer pay for cheap Western energy?
I see the same dynamic playing out with EVs:
"EVs are too expensive we have to subsidize them!"
<China produces EVs that are cheaper than Western cars>
"EVs are too cheap, we have to tariff them!"
This is just handing taxpayer cash to Tesla shareholders with extra steps.
> many of the technical innovations that make cheap solar possible today
Name some? Because it looks to me like a straightforward learning and scaling curve in Chinese factories. If they were actually infringing US patents they'd be blocked on that basis, which tells me they aren't.
Or countries could be heterogenous and care about climate change, energy independence and jobs.
Realpolitick, the political economy, remains important. The sausage factory. Tariffs are the hush money to secure the ongoing support for Bidenomics.
It's super important that every player has its own domestic production. Even if USA's (or EU's) total global market share < 5%, it's worthwhile. De-risk supply chains, national security, upkeep of domestic competency, etc.
Quid pro quo. China could liberalize their economy too. Allow foreign direct investment. Drop their own tarriffs. But they're not (yet?) willing to forfeit autonomy in exchange for "free trade".
--
I get what you're saying. I too agree that fighting climate crisis is our top priority. These slap fights are infuriating. But, for better or worse, you and I aren't in charge.