An abacus and a calculator were both made to solve relativly simple math problems, so they must work in the same way, right?

And apple and an orange are ways to store sugar for plants, so they must be the same thing, right?

No. That's not how any of this works. An abacus and a calculator are two different tools that solve the same problem. They don’t act like each other just because the abstract outcome is the same

> You're proving my point, things like them changing continuously are exactly what I mean when I say the brain is more efficient.

I don't see how that proves that neural networks act like brains.

It's also not just a difference in terms of efficiency, it's the fundamental way that statistical models like neural networks are trained. Every time their trained, it's a brand new model, unlike a brain, which is still the same brain.

Also, neural networks and brains were NOT made to solve the same problems... even if your argument made any sense, it doesn't fit here.