undefined | Better HN

0 pointsanon2911y ago0 comments

We really really really need to disambiguate the LLM, which is a fixed length, fixed compute time process which takes in an input and produces a token distribution, from the AI system, which takes the output of the LLM and eventually produces something for the user.

In this case, all LLMs are fixed-length, but not all AI systems are. An LLM on its own is useless. Current SoTA research includes inserting 'pause' tokens. This is something that, when combined with an AI system that understands these, would enable variable time 'thinking'.

0 comments

wkat42421y ago

Yes. AIs come in all sorts of flavours.

I think the main thing that happened with LLMs was that people anthropomorphise them because they finally understand what's going on. Other AIs might be smarter by solving complicated mathematical problems but most people don't speak that language so they're not impressed.

LLM vendors should really make this clear but they don't because a magical thinking machine sells well.

anon291OP1y ago

> LLM vendors should really make this clear but they don't because a magical thinking machine sells well.

Hold on though... modern LLM systems, like ChatGPT 4o et al do stop and think. The vendors are not selling LLMs. LLMs are an implementation detail. They're selling AI systems: the LLM in addition to the controlling software.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse