> These Epic-requested changes stem from a decision that is completely contrary to another court’s rejection of similar claims Epic made against Apple — even though, unlike iOS, Android is an open platform that has always allowed for choice and flexibility like multiple app stores and sideloading.This part is the most baffling to me; why would the court side with Apple, who allows absolutely no freedom whatsoever, but against Google, which already allows real sideloading (not some kind of fake pay-per-install nonsense like Apple implemented for DSA).
It's a completely ridiculous ruling; can we somehow require judges in these sorts of cases to be tech-literate?
