undefined | Better HN

0 pointsEkaros1y ago0 comments

If there truly is a problem with existing protocols, propose and properly design new one that can replace it. Then if it is technically superior solution it should win in long run.

0 comments

nsnshsuejeb1y ago

No need. Just convince the king (e.g. Google for HTTP) to make a tweak in the next standard version.

vitus1y ago

Good news! Both HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 use a packed binary representation for headers, so CRLF is nowhere to be found in RFC 9113 / 9114.

I don't see value in picking on Google or HTTP here, even if it is fashionable to do so.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse