undefined | Better HN

0 pointslispm1y ago0 comments

Some more background https://larrymasinter.net/stefik-loops.pdf and https://www.markstefik.com/?page_id=334

I think LOOPS was limited by only being available on Interlisp-D related systems. Common LOOPS was supposed to be portable, but I remember it only in the context of the CLOS development as a stepping stone, but not as a product or environment like LOOPS.

0 comments

rjsw1y ago

I ran Common LOOPS in AKCL on a 386 PC. It was just an object system for programming, it didn't have a Frame System or Rule Engine as well like LOOPS.

My previous environment had been Franz Lisp on the Atari ST. My copy of the Franz sources was missing flavors so I wrote my own object system for it that looked a bit like New Flavors but with a frame system built in as well. My binding to GEM from Lisp made use of the object system as well and the repl was in a GEM window.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointslispm1y ago0 comments

Some more background https://larrymasinter.net/stefik-loops.pdf and https://www.markstefik.com/?page_id=334

0 comments

rjsw1y ago

I ran Common LOOPS in AKCL on a 386 PC. It was just an object system for programming, it didn't have a Frame System or Rule Engine as well like LOOPS.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse