I'm not aware of AI companies violating any software ToS or the GPL, but would like to know more.
(And I think that everybody should follow the GPL on software that is licensed that way, just as they should the ToS.)
I'm really curious because my best guesses sound ridiculous to me when I type them out.
> All the while, there’s been debate about whether engineering teams that use generative AI are at risk of violating open source software licensing requirements. (Generative AI tools train, in part, on open source libraries, which leads to questions about whether generative AI output is subject to the same licenses as the training material.)