I don't know how to parse this. What article did Stallman "link", and what are you saying Stallman "expressed" by linking/using it?
> whether the truthness or correlation with reality of an LLM sentence can be judged on its own or whether it requires a human to interpret it is not very relevant
It's incredibly relevant. We wouldn't even be having these debates if complex LLM judgements could always be verified without a human checking the logic.
> sentences produced by the LLM are still correct most of the time
At least half the problem here is that humans are accustomed to using certain cues as an indirect sign of time-investment, attentiveness, intelligence, truth, etc... and now those cues can be cheaply and quickly counterfeited. It breaks all those old correlations faster than we are adapting.
