You don't need to wrap fields. You just pass the classes.

Think about why nobody but you is inconvenienced by this. I am sorry, this is a you problem, because you are violating common idioms of the language.

There is basically never a reason not to pass your data structure to a function, which is why what you are doing is an incredibly niche functionality.

Also functions should be particular to data structure. That is why types exists.

You have missed the point: Functions should not need to be provincial to a specific data structure. Nor should data structures include field wrappers to subvert a language's sloppy mutation semantics.

The point is that with mutable references, you can modify only the part of the struct you need to, using a general function. You can use this same function to modify a different part of the structure, or a different structure, or a free variable.

Your inference that preferring mutable references to wrapper structs implies insufficient knowledge of data structures is puzzling and incorrect.