And in what sense are the Shakespearean monkeys an unhealthy rabble?

I'm currently vibing that those popular+attentionally-limited links are necessary, but not sufficient, for wisdom uncovery..

And that a healthier route may involve actively compensating for the intrinsic asymmetry between Rao's weird & hypernormal in his "new systems of survival".

(Contrast with Jane Jacobs' guardian/commercial, or Rao's latest Mandala/Machine dichotomy, when the yinyang dynamic is much more obvious)

As I mentioned to GP earlier, one design bug with the current dynamic is that there is no affordance* for the hook of enlightenment (moksha) to turn into sustainable (re)production (flow, aka samsara)

Imagine the Shakespearean monkeys, but with a mechanism to string together some of the shorter uncoveries..

* Adfordance, heh

Lagniappe: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edgeworth%27s_limit_theorem

Sorry, "dutch strategy" because the good burghers of Amsterdam, Rotterdam, etc. realised that although sailors have deplorable* morals, the burgher's prosperity depended upon having many sailors transiently around, so the burgher's solution was to create neighbourhoods catering to vice, with the idea that it would be tolerated there, and specifically there — far from the "good" neighbourhoods where their silk-skirted patent-leather-shod daughters hung out.

* we've already touched upon LaSalle(?)'s riposte to Bonaparte, right?

I see, you meant the Dutch defence? Sorry zero chess knowledge here..

As a side effect you may observe that PhD cred'd professional designers (architects) are about as rare as nonsocialist(?) "Democratic Republics" (DRC?)