undefined | Better HN

0 pointssaberience1y ago0 comments

It doesn't work in Windows so how is it cross platform?

Also, I've been using terminals since DOS in 1990 and never once have I had to say, "I wish this terminal had more performance", so I'm not sure that performance is really relevant here. If I write a command to build my project which takes 10 mins to build, does it matter whether the terminal command ran in 10 milliseconds vs 1 millisecond?

In the linked speed demo one command was 8 milliseconds faster than another. Ok?

Is a terminal written in Zig better than one made in C++ or Rust? Again, unsure why its relavant at all.

0 comments

marcus0x621y ago

> It doesn't work in Windows so how is it cross platform?

Linux and macOS are different platforms. Would calling it multi-platform make you happier?

> Also, I've been using terminals since DOS in 1990 and never once have I had to say, "I wish this terminal had more performance",

I remember the Windows terminal being unbearably slow in the past and wishing it had better performance.

Maybe this just isn’t for you.

Fnoord1y ago

If you use something like tmux you will notice higher latencies. Clearly, if you've been using terminals since DOS in 90s and the issue does not bother you, then you are likely happy with whatever it is you are using. If you want to look into the issue and read on methodology used before I recommend Dan Luu's from 2017 [1]

[1] https://danluu.com/term-latency/

cbushko1y ago

| In the linked speed demo one command was 8 milliseconds faster than another. Ok?

For day to day, ls'ing files that speed up won't matter too much. It is when you are tailing logs or working with multi-gig files that it matters.

SG-1y ago

are you still running DOS too?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse