undefined | Better HN

0 pointsboothby1y ago0 comments

LLMs are trained on works -- software, graphics and text -- covered by my copyright. What's the difference?

0 comments

The difference is that you pulling out a model is you potentially violating copyright, while the model itself being trained on copyrighted models is potentially them violating copyrights.

I.e. the first one concerns you, the other is none of your business.

boothbyOP1y ago

Them potentially violating my copyrights is very much my business. But you're right, the difference is how much the respective parties have to spend on legal battles.

Simply showing up to court wearing a tshirt that says "what she said" probably wouldn't fly, but I like to imagine that any arguments made by them about their copyrights would be equally true of my copyrights.

At this point I'm mostly wondering if "you ripped me off first" is a viable legal defense to copyright battles where it's unclear if either party is distributing the works of the other. One thing is for sure though, if I were to do this as an individual, the discovery process would be much more expensive for them than me.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

TeMPOraL1y ago

The difference is that you pulling out a model is you potentially violating copyright, while the model itself being trained on copyrighted models is potentially them violating copyrights.

I.e. the first one concerns you, the other is none of your business.

boothbyOP1y ago

Them potentially violating my copyrights is very much my business. But you're right, the difference is how much the respective parties have to spend on legal battles.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse