undefined | Better HN

0 pointsthrowaway77831y ago0 comments

I know you are being downvoted (not by me). This is a good question, if all the context and history is removed, and we are only looking at who killed more.

I am trying to respond in good faith, but it looks like Hamas is accepted across the world as a terrorist organization for specifically targeting civilians. And as much as I loathe the loss of civilian life at the hands of IDF, this is not a conventional war, and Hamas hiding within civilian populations and tunneling under hospitals is on Hamas and not on IDF. Like it happened in history a million times, Hamas could've surrendered against a superior enemy and and returned hostages, to protect its own citizens.

So, that's why Hamas must cease to exist. Not Palestine itself, nor another government in Palestine - just Hamas. They could've stopped it, they didn't.

Let me know when IDF/Likud behave like this unprovoked (Yes, I know what's going on in West bank and its not remotely close to what Hamas did)

0 comments

steinvakt21y ago

> Hamas could've surrendered against a superior enemy and and returned hostages, to protect its own citizens.

And then Israel would keep occupying more and more land, control their water, electricity, treat Palestinian people like sub-humans, occasionally shoot some children in the head, take palestinian hostages/prisoners without legal right (occasionally tortue and rape them).

What do you do then? Protest peacefully?

Aloisius1y ago

> What do you do then? Protest peacefully?

Actually attempting to attack legitimate military targets seems like a bare minimum we should demand of pretty much everyone.

GuB-421y ago

> What do you do then? Protest peacefully?

Yes.

What has violence solved here? Thousands of people have died, and Palestinians are not treated better. I am no sure what peaceful protests would have done, but "nothing" is still way better than what we have now.

steinvakt21y ago

You should apply that logic to Israel, since they are by far the most violent.

GuB-421y ago

The logic should apply to both, there are no good guys here, just two armies of savages fighting each other and people getting killed, including innocents that just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I pointed out Palestine because Israel is in a dominant position, so it is unlikely that they would want to protest, peacefully or not. But it would be nice to see more "peace-and-love" movements like in the 60s that opposed the Vietnam war, among other things.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

steinvakt21y ago

> Hamas could've surrendered against a superior enemy and and returned hostages, to protect its own citizens.

What do you do then? Protest peacefully?

Aloisius1y ago

> What do you do then? Protest peacefully?

Actually attempting to attack legitimate military targets seems like a bare minimum we should demand of pretty much everyone.

GuB-421y ago

> What do you do then? Protest peacefully?

Yes.

steinvakt21y ago

You should apply that logic to Israel, since they are by far the most violent.

GuB-421y ago

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse