But this thread is about misuse of the term as applied to the weights package. Those of us who know what open source means should not continue to dilute the term by calling these LLMs by that term.
It's just like even for a true open source software you still need to bring your own hardware to run it on.
But we don't actually know all that much about how language really works, for all the resources we spend on linguistics - as the old IBM joke about AI goes, "quality of the product increases every time we fire a linguist" (which is to say, we consistently get better results by throwing "every written word known to man" at a blank model than we do by trying to construct things from our understanding).
All that said, just because we're taking a different, and quite possibly slower / less compute-efficient route, doesn't mean that we can't get to AGI in this way.