Both sides are bad, that much is obvious. If that's all you gleaned from my comment, you completely missed the point being made.
I'm also not going to argue with you about which party is more controlled or hurting the country more. That is a terribly uninteresting online discussion to have.
I reread your comment. All I got out of it was "both sides are bad" and implied that the guy who wrote the article was being hypocritical for quitting due to what Musk is doing but didn't quit during the previous administration.
You say I completely missed the point you were making. I guess so. Can you state it directly as I can't unearth it by reading between the lines.
> implied that the guy who wrote the article was being hypocritical
So it seems like you did get the point of my comment, and purposely didn't address it the first time you responded. I'll say the same thing again in different terms: the author's ethos when it comes to criticizing corrupt political administrations is significantly harmed by the fact that he has worked for corrupt political administrations with seemingly no issue.
Again, your argument rests on your assertion both administrations are equally bad. It is a claim I reject, and thus I also reject your assertion that the author was hypocritical.
