undefined | Better HN

0 pointsglitchc1y ago0 comments

What the Rust community is trying to do is antithetical to the whole free software movement. They want to impose a new language onto an existing body of maintainers who have limited incentives to change.

The "free" part in free software is not just free in beer, it's also free in freedom. That little bit gets forgotten. People work on it because they want to, not because they have to. If a developer does not want to use Rust, they can and should not be forced to. It does not matter if Rust is objectively safer, or better, or any of the purported arguments. Forcing it eliminates the freedom of choice.

The Rust folks should make their own kernel and OS. Let it compete directly with Linux. In open source, this is the way.

0 comments

bryanlarsen1y ago

Since Con Kolivas resigned in 2007 there have been no volunteers making major contributions to the Linux kernel. Everybody is doing it as a job. So they are working on it because they have to, assuming they want to continue to get paid.

steveklabnik1y ago

> They want to impose a new language onto an existing body of maintainers

"The Rust folks" are part of that existing body of maintainers, not some outside force.

imtringued1y ago

What you've said has nothing to do with free software.

"Freedom" doesn't mean freedom from Rust, for starters.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse