If you really think the US went all in on Afghanistan with a world war level effort to conquer the country then I don't know what to tell you. After the initial invasion period the country really was a sideshow and became increasingly less prioritized over the years. By the end of the occupation US forces had shrunk to a minuscule size compared to what an invading army would look like.

That doesn't mean that the war was handled well, it clearly wasn't. But looking at a small force and confusing that with the entire might of the US military is baffling to me. "Losing interest" is a perfectly reasonable description of what happened.

Now, now iraq and syria were pretty big defeats too. Red lines over which third world dictators stepoed pretty invurnerable.

unless the entire goal is to fund various militia groups within the middle east to cause chaos and ensure the ottoman empire cannot rise again and unite under allah while you fund a war to let the oligarchs plunder the natural resources.

For starters I would say that Afghanistan certainly lost. Taliban might have won but certainly not Afghanistan.

> Americans would like to advertise their loss

I couldn’t care less about that. Fact is that the defeat was primarily and almost entirely political, not a military one.

> should be treated as, the biggest failure of the American

Trump: Hold my diet coke

No, you both misunderstood what I said. Lean forces win. The US isn't one. My question is why then does the US waste on bulky investments.