> sentiment is factual
the sentiment might exist, but that doesn't mean it's based on facts
that discussion you linked to can be broken down into:
- people upset because they thought Wikipedia was almost bankrupt and it turns out its not (though Wikipedia never claimed to be in its fund-raising)
- people upset because they see too many requests for donations
- people upset because Wikimedia execs are getting "high" salaries (though they are much _much_ lower than at private co's)
- people upset because they think Wikipedia spreads "left-wing ideologies"
None of this has anything to do with "corruption".