What do you have to say to the 40-year-old man who says he has a
natural right to have sex with 10-year-olds and for the state to punish him for it is just as wrong as state support for slavery was?
It seems that the only effect this "natural right" term has on sufficiently curious interlocutors (who will not fall for your rhetorical trick) is to signal that you are more stubborn than people who do not use the term.