undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrunako10mo ago0 comments

> The primary check on the President is elections, not “the law.” Secondarily, there’s impeachment, and Congress’s power of the purse.

Right, that's where this discussion started. What we are looking at right now is the erosion of that second piece, Congress's power of the purse. The Constitutional checks and balances (not the 20th-century stuff you detail) doesn't work as well without this key Article I power. I have not seen it explained under what principle this power of Congress has been arrogated instead to the Executive.

0 comments

rayiner10mo ago

It wasn’t done based on principle but laziness. Congress undoubtedly has the power to leave some particulars of how to spend money up to the President. But Congress has abused that power to basically provide the executive with giant slush funds with only the vaguest directions as to how to use that money. Congress can take that power back at any time.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsrunako10mo ago0 comments

> The primary check on the President is elections, not “the law.” Secondarily, there’s impeachment, and Congress’s power of the purse.

0 comments

rayiner10mo ago

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse