undefined | Better HN

0 pointsEnPissant10mo ago0 comments

Squash merge gives you the same thing.

0 comments

Squash merges simply guarantee that git bisect will not be able to pinpoint a breaking change, because that history is gone.

EnPissantOP10mo ago

If you treat a PR as a unit of work, then there is nothing to bisect. If you don't treat it as a unit of work, then people just edit their git history to merge commits just like a squash.

Dylan1680710mo ago

> If you treat a PR as a unit of work, then there is nothing to bisect.

You're bisecting the history of PR merges.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse