undefined | Better HN

0 pointsrustc1y ago0 comments

Plausible uses the same algorithm and they have a page written by a lawyer claiming this is GDPR compliant: https://plausible.io/blog/legal-assessment-gdpr-eprivacy

Edit: Found more discussion here: https://github.com/plausible/analytics/discussions/1963#disc...

> To summarize, I believe the EDPB has made their position very clear on this in their 2023 guidelines: Plausible's fingerprinting is subject to Article 5(3) of the ePD. Plausible has made their position very clear in their blog post, leaning in the other direction. Until this is tried out in court, I don't believe that there will be any definitive answer.

0 comments

jhpacker1y ago

Unlike Plausible and Fathom, it looks like Rybbit is NOT salting by default ( (but that it's an option to enable per site: https://www.rybbit.io/docs/enhanced-privacy). Which is why they can offer retention reporting.

This seems incompatible with ePD.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

jhpacker1y ago

This seems incompatible with ePD.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse