undefined | Better HN

0 pointsawkward10mo ago0 comments

Contempt is corrosive, and if you're fixing debt in response to business needs that's putting the turnaround on real business needs at risk.

Goldbricking and polishing turds are definitely pitfalls, but the benefit of a low debt codebase is insanely fast turnaround. If you want to optimize for that, you need to do some fixes in anticipation of need, and sometimes those will be wrong.

Rewrites should bring a lot of skepticism, and are often worse than turd polishing. If it's gotta happen people should be able to take that on evidence rather than respond because they've developed feelings for the turd.

0 comments

frollogaston10mo ago

I get that it's risky and expensive, but I haven't seen it work better than this. The hack workaround sometimes ends up being better than the existing system, cause a rushed timeline forces everyone to be frank about what's actually needed and what they can ignore. They're also forced to pick something simple, not design an overly grand solution with tons of meetings.

The tech debt is still costly, but most of it isn't caused by lack of maintenance, more that something was designed fundamentally poorly from the start.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 pointsawkward10mo ago0 comments

Contempt is corrosive, and if you're fixing debt in response to business needs that's putting the turnaround on real business needs at risk.

0 comments

frollogaston10mo ago

The tech debt is still costly, but most of it isn't caused by lack of maintenance, more that something was designed fundamentally poorly from the start.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse