This... literally sounds like another Theranos. Bizarre and comical.
Is this based on solid R&D, patents, and proof of concept? Or is it more hot air?
>Partner... Luminar
Luminar spent massive amounts of money on in-house tech with no revenue, then ran out of money, shut it all down and outsourced it, diluted shareholders to zero, and the CEO extracted hideous amounts of cash, became one of the richest youngest CEOs of all time, and bought a massive mega millions house in Austin from the shareholder capital. Maybe that's the objective? Well if so, at this point one truly can blame the investors.
Visible association with a convicted fraudster, especially one as high profile her, should be a giant red flag to investors and consumers.
After all, we all know that funded startups are just a pump and dump game. It doesn't matter whether the thing is real at all, what truly matters is how big will the "bigger fool" that comes after you. Holmes attracts eyeballs and thats' all investors need.
Indeed it doesn't. Could you please provide evidence that she is an expert? Running a fraudulent company doesn't count.
