Oh, you mean the comment section, which is explicitly by policy not for extended discussion (and in fact, actual moderators have a template message that they can use when moving those comments to a chat room in bulk, which says so in about as many words).
The purpose of this section under a question is to determine and address issues with the question - by telling you what to fix if you need to fix it, by making sure you're understood so that someone else can fix it, etc.
> and usually there was no answer
It is explicitly against policy to attempt to answer a question in the comments. That's why there are actual answers labelled as such; it's why comments are limited in length and formatting capability; and it's why, when you open the comment submission form, the placeholder text in the text field reads
> Use comments to ask for more information or suggest improvements. Avoid answering questions in comments.
Moving on:
> or just one which recommended to not ask the question
Yes, because questions that aren't fixable shouldn't be asked, and questions that can be fixed should be.
> I neither care much whether the people who blocked my questions are called admins or moderators or whatever, the outcome is the same.
Your questions were not "blocked"; other people were simply prevented from answering them until you fix the question. You are given a minimum of 9 days to do this before automatic deletion, and you can still petition for undeletion.
If you don't care about a site enough even to use or understand its basic terminology, why should that site try to accommodate you?
> I used the site as intented.
No, you clearly did not, based on your demonstrated lack of understanding of basic principles of how the site works.
