The deleted console UI helped you understand the data in the system, get started with it and do some basic admin. But for any real application built on it, you'd need to build some of your own tooling and get acquainted with the mc command line tool. It was a very shallow UI - it didn't help with ACLs where you just had a big box to paste your JSON into.
It also had a lot of asterisks to show you which tabs were premium - at least they were visible.
Now it lets you browse buckets, but not create users? All the premium tabs are gone. If I hadn't used it before this I'd have assumed it was just raw and unfinished.
It's solid software, but the documentation really only covers the happy paths, and there's no community around it.
Annual pricing for the complete package & support is about 75% of Backblaze's, but you have to bring your own hardware and network. I guess it compares much more favorably against S3, or maybe better still if you're going to exabytes.
But yeah this just seems like damage to the on-ramp for people who want to grow into it.
Ceph seems like the only battle-tested alternative. It has a community around it, but the setup is more demanding than minio.
I went into the office and met the two founders. Both were nice and welcoming, but it felt like there was absolutely zero process or structure in the company at all. They didn't have a product or vision. It was more or less "we're building cool stuff".
I wasn't asked a single technical or business question. I was asked what I would like to work on and they suggested I come into the office and do some open source work on whatever I want and if I enjoyed it they would hire me.
Not a bad experience, but very bizarre and out of the norm.
It's sad because this was a great product that grew to be what it was as a result of community interest, and now they're destroying the community version to try to force revenue. Maybe they'll even triple the price again for no reason other than that they can.
Fly does something similar, except they pay you for the evaluation work.
If a developer needs a pay day, are we surprised if they take it from an investor who wants returns?
I think in that scenario, it would be much more clear-cut that the responses would be:
1. Well that's a bummer that MinIO wasn't sustainable as it was; I'll just stick with 1.x forever, or
2. Well thank goodness this new company stepped up and is taking over maintenance and development; I'm willing to pay them to get ongoing support and having continued access to the web console feature in new versions seems like a fair price to pay.
Only contribute to projects that:
1. Have a Copyleft license
2. Have no CLA and do not require copyright assignment
3. Have enough independent contributors to make relicensing practically impossible
Bonus points if the project is governed by a 501(3) (not a 501(6)).
MinIO fails point 2. Redis failed point 1. Happy to hear a good example for failing point 3. Basically a (A)GPL product that was only developed by employees.
(Unfortunately I never had good experiences with MinIO, because it was just a bit less complicated than Ceph and the docs and admin tools much less mature and stable, and due to this I simply never got to performance evaluation.)
Also, github sponsors seems to work some as well. I enabled it last year and I've had a few gracious souls throw up to $50 at a time into my tip jar, though I've sent out way more than has come in (but that's ok).
I sure wish I could get my company to start contributing some significant funds though. We get a huge benefit from open source, but never seem to have the money to spend towards it.
What, and pay the people actually creating the value?!
If MinIO were to require a license to run, I’m sure I could convince a boss at work to pay several thousands a month for it.
Currently, we are paying about 5000€/month for the hardware to run our MinIO cluster and 0€/month for the MinIO devs. If we now want to keep using their UI, the license costs would be €20.000,-/month. That is an insane gap
No wonder that we are slowly coming back to the shareware, public domain and trial demos, used to distribute software on 8 and 16 bit home computing.
As a society we should probably consider such behavior unacceptable and deserving of strong governmental protection. But alas, this behavior makes line go up.
they do not burn it to the ground, community has open source high quality product for absolutely free developed on investors money. Anyone can fork it, and do whatever he wants. I imagine if product is very good, and parent corp will decide to close sources, there could be some smaller business/consultancy supporting OSS version of this, or even MS/Google take over it as it happened many times e.g. ElasticSearch vs OpenSearch.
The saddest thing here is that MinIO is apparently not important enough for the big names that use it to receive donations / sponsorship funds sufficient to continue as is :-/
We need more people looking to Jimmy Wales as an example of how FLOSS can work instead of Silicon Valley.
It's also perhaps worth pointing out that they once had a very strange interpretation of AGPL that caused quite the drama some years ago: https://github.com/minio/minio/issues/13308#issuecomment-929...
> Also, just want to mention that the AGPL license requires that all software connecting with MinIO be 100% open source for you/your users not to be in violation of the license.
That's the type of people we are dealing with here, probably best to stay away from it. If AGPL itself didn't already deter you.
Before investigating it for eventual production use, I heard quite a bit about how complicated it was to use, but for my use case (storage for enterprise and academic k8s clusters) it's actually been quite simple to deploy and use. cephadm (one of many ceph management tools) can handle nearly all our bootstrapping and management needs. Little to no tweaking or configuration needed. Fairly low overhead. Very reliable and resilient to adverse conditions. Easy to handle different storage types and data retention needs.
One thing I will warn you, if you go the ceph docs site right now and just start browsing, it is in fact quite overwhelming because ceph has the capacity to handle a ton of edge cases and unusual environments. I'd recommend taking 15 minutes and build this [1], which gives you a fully functional toy-sized ceph cluster on a single node. Then, hit the docs to fill in the gaps of what you need to know for your deployment.
https://jamesoclaire.com/2025/05/27/how-to-self-host-your-ow...
fetch("https://dl.min.io/server/minio/agplv3-ack", {
mode: "no-cors",
})
This looks like it could be the "you downloaded the Virtual Box Expansion Pack from a corporate IP" Oracle playbook to me. Certainly falls under "mistreating the user".https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neo4j#Criticisms
> Neo4j sued PureThink, a small business that had used a power created under the terms of the GNU AGPL, to remove a restrictive Commons clause that Neo4j had added to the AGPL license. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California made a decision on 2024-07-22 to impose $597,000 in actual damages on PureThink, having previously decided that PureThink had violated the DMCA by removing the Commons Clause from Neo4j's AGPL license, and that it had violated trademark law by continuing to use the name Neo4j in selling to government agencies.
S3 is pretty well established and commoditized and there are alternatives.
There is literally no moat here, let alone one that would hold up for charging nearly 100 grand. Seems like a pretty bizarre play.
- Ceph
- SeaweedFS
- Garage
- CubeFS
- Apache Ozone
Do any of them fill the niche that MinIO sits in? (Relatively easy to set up and operate and with all the typical enterprise bells & whistles)
Ozone/Ceph -> Way more complicated
Among others, an inevitable torrent of forks of MinIO by people who want to keep the UI but backport any other security or architectural fixes.
Or, as the author points out and if it works for you, a 33% price increase to go to B2 from Backblaze and not have to manage your own hardware, network, infrastructure, etc.
Or, for enterprise shops, another storage appliance with an S3-compatible interface (e.g. Dell has some options)
There’s probably a better more original source…