But the last few paragraphs of the piece kind of give away the game — the author is an AI skeptic judging only the current products rather than taking in the scope of how far they’ve come in such a short time frame. I don’t have much use for this short sighted analysis. It’s just not very intelligent and shows a stubborn lack of imagination.
It reminds me of that quote “it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends on his not understanding it.”
People like this have banked their futures on AI not working out.
