I mean sure, why not. My argument isn't that it doesn't work, it's that it doesn't really save time
If you try to have it do big changes you will be swamped reviewing those changes for correctness for a long time while you build a mental model of the work
If you have it do small changes, the actual performance improvement is marginal at best, because small changes already don't take much time or effort to create
I really think that LLM-coding has largely just shifted "time spent typing" to "time spent reviewing"
Yes, past a certain size reviewing is faster than typing. But LLMs are not producing terribly good output for large amounts of code still