I think if you use a very loose definition of learning:
A stimuli which alters subsequent behavior you can claim this is learning. But if you tell a human to replace the word “is” with “are” in the next two sentences, this could hardly be considered
learning, rather it is just following commands, even though it meets the previous
loose definition. This is why in psychology we usually include some timescale for how long the altered behavior must last for it to be considered learning. A short-term altered behavior is usually called
priming. But even then I wouldn’t even consider “following commands” to be neither priming nor learning, I would simply call it
obeying.
If an LLM learned something when you gave it commands, it would probably be reflected in some adjusted weights in some of its operational matrix. This is true of human learning, we strengthen some neural connection, and when we receive a similar stimuli in a similar situation sometime in the future, the new stimuli will follow a slightly different path along its neural pathway and result in a altered behavior (or at least have a greater probability of an altered behavior). For an LLM to “learn” I would like to see something similar.
