undefined | Better HN

0 pointsksec11mo ago0 comments

I think that is the simplest and best analogy I have read so far in the comments.

0 comments

The chef doesn't create a meal once that you can sell for the next 10 years though. You pay him for time X, he makes a meal, you sell that meal.

That's fundamentally different from regular software development outside of agencies where there is no direct relationship. Software development is closer to an investment than an expense.

Amortization sucks in general, yes, because the money is gone and it doesn't affect your taxes to the same amount, but that's not different for any company doing manufacturing or anyone needing specialized tools or vehicles that cost significant amounts.

cake_robot11mo ago

When someone pays for labor to build an apartment building they profit off for decades, do they amortize that labor?

ksecOP11mo ago

I think there is an argument that both could be valid. I wonder why we cant let the company decide to pick one over another and not be so fixated on one tax code to rule them all.

triceratops11mo ago

A comment I read in the thread here says the answer is "Yes". To which I have to say, that sucks.

beezle11mo ago

That is production, not R&D. Basic research into, for instance, semiconductors may one day lead to the production of a new product. The R&D costs would be amortized, the eventual production costs would not.

klipt11mo ago

> The chef doesn't create a meal once that you can sell for the next 10 years though. You pay him for time X, he makes a meal, you sell that meal.

What if the chef invents a new signature dish that makes your restaurant famous for the next 10 years?

luckylion11mo ago

If El Bulli was in the US that would be an interesting question, but for "normal" cuisine it doesn't match, I think.

For chains like McDonalds where they actually research and develop ways to make pink slime look like a burger, maybe? But do you call them chefs?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse

0 comments

luckylion11mo ago

The chef doesn't create a meal once that you can sell for the next 10 years though. You pay him for time X, he makes a meal, you sell that meal.

That's fundamentally different from regular software development outside of agencies where there is no direct relationship. Software development is closer to an investment than an expense.

cake_robot11mo ago

When someone pays for labor to build an apartment building they profit off for decades, do they amortize that labor?

ksecOP11mo ago

I think there is an argument that both could be valid. I wonder why we cant let the company decide to pick one over another and not be so fixated on one tax code to rule them all.

triceratops11mo ago

A comment I read in the thread here says the answer is "Yes". To which I have to say, that sucks.

beezle11mo ago

klipt11mo ago

> The chef doesn't create a meal once that you can sell for the next 10 years though. You pay him for time X, he makes a meal, you sell that meal.

What if the chef invents a new signature dish that makes your restaurant famous for the next 10 years?

luckylion11mo ago

If El Bulli was in the US that would be an interesting question, but for "normal" cuisine it doesn't match, I think.

For chains like McDonalds where they actually research and develop ways to make pink slime look like a burger, maybe? But do you call them chefs?

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse