undefined | Better HN

0 pointslesuorac9mo ago0 comments

The article makes it clear it's a subsidy.

> Originally enacted in 1954, Sec. 174 has historically allowed taxpayers to deduct SRE expenditures in the year incurred. Its original aim was to level the playing field for small businesses, those without dedicated research teams, that may be unable to deduct product development expenses under Sec. 162 because the costs were not ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in carrying on a trade or business

Straight-up, any deviation in the tax code for a special group is always a subsidy.

0 comments

demosthanos9mo ago

Just to be clear, "special group" here means "any small business that wants to do any R&D of any kind", right? Because software was not a special group before, all R&D was opt-in for this kind of accounting.

Now, after this change, software is a special group singled out, a deviation in the tax code specially carved out for us to make our field specifically the exceptional one with no wiggle room. No other type of development is named in Section 174 to explicitly require companies to amortize.

So who is that subsidizing now?

lesuoracOP9mo ago

> So who is that subsidizing now?

Uh sure, with this change software would subsidize other R&D. Prior to the change anybody not eligible for Section 174 was subsidizing Section 174 recipients.

Subsidizing R&D is probably a good idea but let's call a spade a spade here. Additionally, subsidizing small business is good policy because they're by the numbers job creators while large businesses are job destroyers.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse