undefined | Better HN

0 pointsbeaned9mo ago0 comments

There are rovers on Mars already that landed on the first try. The approach was rigorous planning and study with the highest standards.

It doesn't mean the approach SpaceX is taking isn't valuable in some contexts, but it's certainly not the only method.

0 comments

Teever9mo ago

That seems like a poor example given how many failed attempts to land something on Mars that took place before they got to designs that would get it right in the first go.

yborg9mo ago

The Viking landers were the first attempt by the US to land on Mars. The Soviets actually soft-landed first on their second try but the lander failed after transmitting one corrupted image. There were certainly many failed Mars missions by various countries, but the Vikings at least got it right on the first go.

mulmen9mo ago

NASA’s first attempt to land on Mars was successful. I count 11 total attempts with one failure.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_missions_to_Mars

m4rtink9mo ago

Yeah, this is a remarkably good score - for comparison Europe is at 0 out of 2. :P

The first one [1] actually landed but failed to send back any data (kinda like the soviet example) due to deployment failure.

But the second one will at least have an impact on future generations, with people being confused why there are two Shiaparelli[2] craters on Mars. ;-)

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beagle_2 [2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schiaparelli_EDM

mstipetic9mo ago

The rocket booster landing of mars rover also hasn’t been tried before.

beAbU9mo ago

Infinitely more fun to witness though.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse