-- | Flipped version of '<$>'.

infixl 1 <&>

(<&>) :: Functor f => f a -> (a -> b) -> f b

as <&> f = f <$> as

```

"infix", "Functor", and "as" are the only words in this code. Everything else is single letters (thanks math traditions..) and punctuation. What's a <&>? <$>? ::? We've got two different kinds of arrows, => and ->. -- is obviously enough a line comment. At least I know what = means.. give or take it's constant ambiguous meaning between languages of assignment and/or equality testing.

And this isn't even delving into the black arts of defining types, where the really ugly punctuation toolkits get opened.

I don't care whether or not they represent regular functions nor what their calling syntax is. What I care is that the base language has many many dozens of them to remember and then to parse in the wild, and then that authors are encouraged to continue proliferating more of them:

```Haskell

-- What does this 'mouse operator' mean? :thinking_suicide:

(~@@^>) :: Functor f => (a -> b) -> (a -> c -> d) -> (b -> f c) -> a -> f d

```

Credit: Kowainik's Haskell Style Guide https://kowainik.github.io/posts/2019-02-06-style-guide