However, the present state is also worth a look!

The three uniquely human factors which people keep saying a machine can never do:

1. Empathy: they win by default. (My reference group is twenty friends and seven therapists.)

2. Critical Thinking: they win with the correct prompt. (You need to explicitly work against the sycophancy. i.e. the desire to appear empathetic limits the ability to convey true information to a human.)

3. Creativity: I want to say creativity lags behind, in LLMs at least, but Midjourney is blowing my damn mind, so I might have to give them that, too.

That's with the versions of AI we have today. My comment was referring to the ultimate goal, i.e. where this is all heading.

To put it explicitly, we intend to:

(1) make them in our image (trained after our mental output, and shaped after our body),

(2) while also making them vastly superior intellectually and physically (strength, endurance, etc.),

(3) while also expecting them to have no will of their own -- except as it aligns with ours. (We do actually need to give them a will to make them useful.)

I do not expect that to end very well.