This is an easy way for large companies to generate more liquidity (from foreign investors) and often has tax or other advantages for investors in that they don't need to report an FX pnl- they can just hold the stock in their main currency even though its primary listing is actually in a different currency.
These are usually called ADRs (American Depositary Receipts) and EDRs (European depositary receipts) based on whether the instrument is listed in the US or Europe. So the Vodaphone example above of a UK public company trading a depositary receipt on Nasdaq would be an ADR.
The point is the mechanism here is reasonably well-established in normal finance.
Unless tokenized securities will somehow make private investments accessible to non-accredited investors, this initiative seems to be entirely missing the elephant in the room, at least in the US.
There was an article on how cut-throat (pun intended) low the margins are for money laundering in the competition between businesses to get drug trafficked US dollars from Mexico to China.
And conversely, if the US government doesn't want you as a shareholder (and by extension US financial institutions can't serve you), good luck to anyone trying to (knowingly or negligently) redeem any VOO that you've touched.
The big institutions can measure their profits in terms of settlement time, going from 2 days to 1 day (previous infrastructure upgrades) to instantaneous (this) makes them more money.
In the EU, as far as I remember most modern brokers let you buy shares with unsettled proceeds of others without restrictions; in the US, getting a margin account takes no effort at all and bypasses the freeriding rules too.
Or how you see big institutions making more money by reducing settlement time?
They LOVE playing this game. "We are doing this so you can now be the whale you always dreamed you would be!" But mean while they cut you to shreds with fees.
(paper stock certificates are no longer a thing except in rare circumstances, digitization took place long ago ["dematerialization"] at the clearinghouse)
Also the dollar backed ones would only fail if the foundations behind them fail (Eg. USDC)
https://www.cnbc.com/2023/03/11/stablecoin-usdc-breaks-dolla...
Or is this yet another magical crypto thing where we collectively agree/imagine that tokens are somehow pegged to private companies, without any direct ownership to said companies?
Matt Levine has a good rundown here: https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/newsletters/2025-06-26/any...
Makes me wonder what happens if/when the next WeWork or Theranos rolls around, and people are invested via these types of trades.
Surely we should keep comparing it to a decades old globalized financial system with formalized state support from many nations and a market cap measurable in the trillions.
But you can trade EU, FTSE100, EM, etc. at a PE range of 15-20. While this is not historically cheap, it is also ont over-rated.
Why does we risk a crash more by using crypto exchanges over regular exchanges?
This is an incredibly lazy comment and reads like an involuntary spasm.