> Kinda. Except in OCaml this deficiency does not exist:
Named arguments are allowed only for methods, not for
let-bound functions, function values, or lambda expressions.
True. They are different languages after all, sharing a common ancestor in ML[0] yet diverging for their own reasons.
Still, the original concern was identified thusly:
>> I do not understand how they could develop a language inspired by OCaml but not bring over labeled function arguments.
0 - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_(programming_language)
