undefined | Better HN

0 pointsseba_dos17mo ago0 comments

Did you accidentally reply to a wrong comment? (not trying to be snarky, just confused)

The only "justification" there would be is that it keeps the server online that struggled under load before deploying it. That's the whole reason why major FLOSS projects and code forges have deployed Anubis. Nobody cares about bots downloading FLOSS code or kernel mailing lists archives; they care about keeping their infrastructure running and whether it's being DDoSed or not.

0 comments

tptacek7mo ago

I just said you didn't have to justify it. I don't care why you run it. Run whatever you want. The point of the post is that regardless of your reasons for running it, it's unlikely to work in the long run.

seba_dos1OP7mo ago

And what I said is that all these most visible deployments of Anubis did not deploy it to be a content protection system of any kind, so it doesn't have to work this way at all for them. As long as the server doesn't struggle with load anymore after deploying Anubis, it's a win - and it works so far.

(and frankly, it likely will only need to work until the bubble bursts, making "the long run" irrelevant)

rfoo7mo ago

> and frankly, it likely will only need to work until the bubble bursts, making "the long run" irrelevant

Now I get why people are so weirdly being dismissive about the whole thing. Good luck, it's not going to "burst" any time soon.

Or rather, a "burst" would not change the world in the direction you want it to be.

1 more reply

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse