Nobody would claim that. But are you trying to say that the language has no effect on reliability? Because that's obviously nonsense.
Language choice has some effect on reliability, and I would say Python's effect is mediocre-to-bad. Depending on if you use Pyright. Not too bad if you do. Pretty awful if you don't.
But not equally flawed.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/dLJv2CoRCgeC2mPgj/the-fallac...
It's not true you can't build reliable software in python. People have. There's proof of it everywhere. Tons of examples of reliable software written in python which is not the safest language.
I think the real thing here is more of a skill issue. You don't know how to build reliable software in a language that doesn't have full type coverage. That's just your lack of ability.
I'm not trying to be insulting here. Just stating the logic:
A. You claim python can't build reliable software.
B. Reliable Software for python actually exists, therefore your claim is incorrect
C. You therefore must not have experience with building any software with python and must have your hand held and be baby-sitted by rusts type checker.
But I can build reliable software without types as well. Many people can. This isn’t secret stuff that only I can do. There are thousands and thousands of reliable software built on Python, ruby and JavaScript.
https://python.plainenglish.io/how-instagram-uses-python-sca...