Starfront Observatories (opens in new tab)

(starfront.space)

51 pointsstefanpie6mo ago15 comments

15 comments

Funny I should see this on the front page, since I’m one of the (likely) few lunatics on HN who rents a pier at Starfront. So far I can say that they’re definitely one of the better offerings when it comes to remote observatories. Shipping my gear and setting it up was a tad painful, but once everything is operational the rest is a breeze. Plus the onsite staff are very responsive when it comes to servicing my CDK (cleaning/upgrades/resets/etc.)

For those who want to try telescope colocation on a budget, they also have a relatively cheap ZWO Seestar pier option. I haven’t given _that_ a try yet, but I’ve heard good things about it on Cloudynights.

charlie06mo ago

I thought this was service where I could rent out a high powered telescope for a few hours, but rather you send in your own telescope. Still a nifty idea for those who love astronomy.

theresistor6mo ago

https://www.itelescope.net/

staplung6mo ago

For be it for me to knock what seems to be a successful idea but at a certain point, putting so many telescopes into the same place starts to seem a bit odd in that many of them are presumably pointing at the same things at the same time. This given the fact that there are 110 Messier objects and perhaps a dozen other things (planets mostly) that would be of much interest to astrophotographers.

Might be more efficient to get a large group to go in on bigger telescopes 'til you have enough of them that no matter what single thing you want to photograph, there'll be something pointed that way that's bigger than what you could afford on your own. Astrophotography isn't really about that of course but at a certain point this doesn't seem too different than reprocessing data from an observatory.

AstroNutt6mo ago

Don't forget about NCG and IC objects. The NGC (New General Catalog) contains a total of 7,840 unique objects.

The IC (Index Catalogue) contains 5,386 celestial objects, making it a substantial addition to the NGC.

jxcl6mo ago

Besides that, even if you are pointed at the same thing, you might disagree on or have different needs for gain, exposure time, and filters. GP’s comment is hilariously confident yet ignorant.

moralestapia6mo ago

What a visionary.

Feel free to do your efficient observatory and post back the results.

uoaei6mo ago

"Far be it from me"

password43216mo ago

Mentioned on a related discussion ~2 months ago:

Remote hosting for your telescope

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44741078 (151 points, 44 comments)

m3kw96mo ago

ok so why not download a high res photo off the web? There is probably a photo for every single astronomy thing you want to photograph?

saaaaaam6mo ago

Why do anything yourself? I love cooking. It takes me hours. I could order the same thing from a delivery service or go eat at a restaurant and not have to wash up pots and pans afterwards.

But the process of going and visiting shops, selecting ingredients, chopping, slicing, stirring, searing, seasoning, getting things wrong, getting things right and then sitting down to eat something that I’ve cooked is far more satisfying than ordering in.

kstrauser6mo ago

I get the appeal. Those are pictures are stunning, and probably better than I could take myself, but they aren't my picture. I can see wanting to take one of my own, even if someone else has already done it.

NoiseBert696mo ago

It's like ham radio: you can buy fully certified working receivers - or build one yourself. Latter one has huge learning curve and gives you full control over the process, the first one not.

kryptiskt6mo ago

In addition to it being fun to do it yourself, it's still possible for an amateur to beat the pros in certain areas like finding new comets (like 2I/Borisov).

SiempreViernes6mo ago

I think this is a service that makes sense for people who bough expensive telescopes but realised too late they live in a big city that is constantly overcast.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse