> We built one called Arbitrus. We put it through a mini-Choi test and it mopped the floor with the competition
It seems like the answer is neither: on their website, Arbitrus.ai says it's for private arbitration. "Arbitrus is a private court system with an AI judge. Why use the public court system or expensive AAA arbitration to settle your disputes, when you can do it faster, cheaper, and better with Arbitrus?"
> Declaration of Interest: [Authors] have financial interests in...Arbitrus.ai. As the title would suggest, the authors are making no effort to obfuscate this fact.
Looking at the paper, the classifier definitely does output its reasoning:
"The legal issue at hand is whether the 50/50 royalty split in the 1961 contract binds only pre-existing affiliates or if it also includes affiliates that come into being after the agreement..."
Even LLMs can be viewed as classifiers, as the paper (ad?) itself admits.
