undefined | Better HN

0 pointsFischgericht5mo ago0 comments

All of this is regulatory stuff. Your state has the option of making it expensive and a PITA or not.

In my ex home town in Germany we had the exact same thing as you are describing - Fiber available everywhere up to 20 meters away from our house, and no chance to get it connected. For purely regulatory reasons.

0 comments

BenjiWiebe5mo ago

True. And starlink is a way to bypass all your/my local regulatory hurdles. They had to deal with several very large regulatory hurdles, and then they're golden. No dealing with every little town separately.

FischgerichtOP5mo ago

Not true really. You will hit regulatory hurdles if your rockets explode in other countries too often :)

And: RF spectrum is HIGHLY regulated.

Also, 4 weeks ago they spent 17 BILLION USD on buying ~30 MHz of spectrum in the 2 Ghz range. 30 MHz translated to a total bandwidth capacity of about 300 MBit/s.

Yes, you have read that correctly: 17 Billion for 300 MBit/s.

lxgr5mo ago

So you're telling people to live with bad/no Internet connection now (due to local regulations) because of hypothetical future problems with their viable alternative in the future?

Easy advice to give from the outside, especially (presumably) from a place with great fiber options.

> Also, 4 weeks ago they spent 17 BILLION USD on buying ~30 MHz of spectrum in the 2 Ghz range. 30 MHz translated to a total bandwidth capacity of about 300 MBit/s.

That's L-band spectrum for direct-to-device services, which comes at a heavy premium due to its advantageous physical properties and inherent scarcity (the entire L-band has fewer Hz of spectrum than what Starlink alone is already using in the Ka band). Ka-band spectrum is much, much cheaper. You're comparing the cost of real estate for factory/campus on a green field hours away from everyone with that of a high street storefront.

j / k navigate · click thread line to collapse