The first one is bad indeed, but what's so "authoritarian" about the rest?

>https://www.bundestag.de/webarchiv/textarchiv/2018/kw08-de-v...

Other European countries like Switzerland, also banned full face veils(burqas) in public. Try entering a bank, city hall, school, etc with a balaclava, ski mask or motorcycle helmet see how that goes.

>https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/19/304/1930412.pdf

Allowing the surveillance of minors if they show signs of radicalization? This to me makes sense under existing child protection laws. If kids are being raised in environments that are harmful to themselves and society, should we just sit by and let them get permanently wrecked till they reach adulthood, over a technicality? The earlier you can catch the issues the better for everyone and the higher the chance you can rescue the child. Existing child protection laws in Germany already allow the state a lot of power to take children away from parents if they're seen as unfit.

>https://dserver.bundestag.de/btd/19/111/1911127.pdf

Taking citizenship away from those who voluntarily join terrorist organizations like ISIS? 100% agree with this, how could you not?

These are common sense viewpoints a lot of Europeans agree with, not authoritarian ones.

The problem is that most Indo-European languages have grammatical gender, with English being a notable exception. In many cases, trying to fit that inclusive language means contorting or breaking the language grammar in unnatural ways, that's why many people oppose it.