Arko explained why he changed the password. Yes, he should have communicated the change, and that's on him. I still can't understand why RC preferred to publish a hit piece on him instead of... calling him to ask if he had changed the password? Bonkers.

Now, are you using that to justify the hostile takeover of critical infrastructure to the entire Ruby community? I'm baffled. RC did a *hostile takeover*. How many times do I have to repeat this?