Depends on the use-case, IPsec is often not supported by many LANs. Also, network crossing is 1 badly configured client away from full infrastructure worming.
At some point, the idealism of white-listed pears and VPN will fail due to maintenance service costs. Two things may be true at the same time friend. =3
CVE-2024-26950 is also true, and while I respect your opinion... a VPN has a lot of additional links in the chain trivially broken by competent hostiles or incompetent client installations.
IPSec is simply a luxury unavailable on some LANs =3
I don't understand what you think CVE-2024-26950 has to do with this thread. Do you understand what that vulnerability actually is, or did you just go search "WireGuard CVE" to find ammunition?
