> Your post is very long on inflamed political rhetoric but short on coherent arguments or facts
Which of the many facts I stated was incorrect?
* A single activist judge overruled shareholders
* A high-achieving CEO was left with with zero compensation for a ten year period
* Musk's compensation was agreed by a majority of shareholders both before and after the judge annulled it.
* Musk has a conservative political worldview
* The judge that annulled Musk's compensation was Democrat-appointed
* A man's political worldview should have no bearing on the compensation owed to him by his employer
